Friday, June 29, 2007

Message in a bottle? Guzzle this one ...

Americans spend $15 billion on bottled water,
despite the fact we can simply turn on the tap


The other day I bought six cases of bottled water at Sam’s Club, planning to restock the home and office refrigerators.

I actually stood there and debated whether to buy the Nestlé PureLife “purified water” for $4.24 a case (32, 16.9 ounce bottles), or the
Zephyrhills “natural spring water,” which was premium priced at $4.46 a case.

I decided “natural” had to be better than “purified,” so I sprang for the spring water, splurging an extra 22 cents a case.

At $4.46 for 32 bottles, that works out to a fraction under 14 cents a bottle. (By comparison, a 32-can case of Diet Coke at Sam’s Club runs about $7 — or 22 cents per 12-ouncer.)

As I pushed the very heavy flat-bed cart to the cash register — I’ve since learned that water weighs 8-1/3 pounds per gallon, so I was about to load 221-1/4 pounds of water into my car — I wondered, “How the heck do they make money on this water?”

There are 32 plastic bottles with screw caps in each case. Each one has a printed paper label on it. Each case consists of a sturdy cardboard bottom that is shrink-wrapped with printed plastic. Of course, there’s water in each bottle.

The water provider has to make money, the bottler has to make money, the bottlemaker and the label/shrink-wrap printers have to make money, the shipper/distributor has to make money, and Sam’s Club has to make money ... otherwise, no one would undertake the job of making a case of water available to me for $4.46 — 14 cents per bottle.

How do they chop up that 14 cents? How can there be any profit margin in a 14-cent bottle of water?

There is an answer. Fast Company magazine this month has a fascinating story about the bottled-water industry. It’s long, but it’s incredibly interesting. Here are few sips from it to wet your whistle:

• Americans spent more money last year on bottled water than on iPods or movie tickets: $15 billion. It’ll be $16 billion this year.

• In Fiji, a state-of-the-art factory spins out more than a million bottles a day of the hippest bottled water on the U.S. market, while more than half the people in Fiji do not have safe, reliable drinking water. Which means it is easier for the typical American in Beverly Hills or Baltimore to get a drink of safe, pure, refreshing Fiji water than it is for most people in Fiji.

• In San Francisco, the municipal water comes from inside Yosemite National Park. It's so good the EPA doesn't require San Francisco to filter it. If you bought and drank a bottle of Evian ($1.35 at retail), you could refill that 16.9-ounce bottle once a day for 10 years, 5 months, and 21 days with San Francisco tap water before that water would cost $1.35. Put another way, if the water we use at home cost what even cheap bottled water costs, our monthly water bills would run $9,000.

To drink up the whole story, click here

Tuesday, June 26, 2007

Will iBuy the iPhone? iDon't think so!

For once I'll resist temptation,
wait for likely improvements


Hi, my name is Ken, and I'm an Appleholic.

That's why it was hard for me to get through Friday, when the iPhone went on sale and hundreds of thousands -- maybe a million? -- people finally got their mitts on the most anticipated gadget in the history of, well, gadgetry.

They'll be showing off their iPhones to family and friends. I'll be sulking in a dark, lonely place, going through withdrawal.

As much as iWant an iPhone, iWon't buy one. iMust resist.

How serious is my affliction?

In 1984, I drove 166 miles from Cleveland to the University of Michigan to be among the first Macintosh computer owners in the country. That machine -- with its blazing 8MHz processor, 128k of RAM and 9-inch black and white screen -- got me through college, and I've been a Mac user ever since. A heavy user.

I've always been an Apple early-adopter, buying five different computers as soon as they were introduced. Always, I'd find myself regretting that I didn't wait a few months for a second- or third-generation product. (For example, my iMac has no built-in camera, and doesn't run on an Intel chip. Those came out seven months after I bought mine, and at a lower price. I have the sweats.)

With four Macs (one desktop, three laptops . . . don't ask) and two iPods (one regular, one video) I surely qualify as an Apple nut, but this time I'm going to wait.

The first wave of reviews has been overwhelmingly positive, but mentions of clunky functionality and missing features on the iPhone, and critical comments about the AT&T data network, are enough to give me pause.

In a few months Apple will make improvements, AT&T will get its act together, third-party developers will add lots of widgets and Web apps, and the price will come down.

And, I won't have to wait in line!

(I'm trying to convince myself I'm doing the right thing. iMust resist.)

As it turns out, I'm in the market for a new mobile phone; my previous contract has expired, and I switched to a prepaid plan so I'd have the flexibility to grab an iPhone.

But $499 or $599 is a lot of dough for a gadget. Tack on taxes and a two-year plan from AT&T, and you could be looking at $2,365 -- nearly $100 a month -- to make phone calls, check your e-mail, send text messages, take pictures, surf the Web, listen to music and watch videos.

Instead, I'll use one of my four Apple computers for the Internet functions, use one of the two iPods for my entertainment needs -- and pay 10 cents a minute for my calls and texts on a little phone that doesn't even have a camera.

I might as well save money, since I've already lost a bundle. Back in early March, I told some friends that we needed to buy as much Apple stock as we could. Mortgage the houses, I said. The price that day was $88 a share. Lately, Apple shares have been trading around $120. That's a $32 bump in four months. Of course, I bought zero shares.

So, good luck, iPhone pioneers! Give Apple lots of feedback so we interlopers get something better -- when the tremors wear off.

Labels: , ,